Search This Blog

Friday, December 11, 2009

Holy Global Warming, Batman!

First up on my skeptical look at the loons in Copenhagen is a new prediction next year will be the hottest year on record. I wonder if they’re using East Anglia’s charts to come up with this prophesy in the new religion of Global Warming.


http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/next-year-forecast-to-be-hottest-on-record-1838184.html


They start the article out in typical East Anglia scientific method with a lie, claiming 1998 was the hottest year in the 160 year instrumental record. I have two points to make about this. 1934 was the hottest year on record – out of the ten hottest years, four were in the 1930’s and three in the 1990’s. It’s been cooling ever since 1998. Second point is 160 years means absolutely nothing in earth history. The middle ages were warmer than now and they didn’t drive around in SUV’s back then. Warming is a cyclical phenomena caused by the sun not by puny humans. Holy Global Warming is an arrogant human invention to control and tax us puny humans, perpetrated by ignorant leaders and white coated hucksters. This makes Al Gore the perfect prophet for their new religion.


Number two on the hit parade is if the US decides to curtail our airline industry to cut CO2 emissions to make us more popular in the eyes of the Holy Global Warming Acolytes as described here –


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/10/cut-carbon-emissions-dire-consequences-travel-industry/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%253A+foxnews%252Flatest+%2528FOXNews.com+-+Latest+Headlines%2529


This will of course destroy us as a nation with unintended consequences. I didn’t think we’d float this trial balloon so quickly on the heels of the UK’s ‘Committee on Climate Change’ plot to tax the crap out of their travelers. If you have an imagination you will be able to visualize a time in the near future where it will be cheaper to walk across the continent to obtain a product than order it sent by air freight.


Last but not least comes from ‘The Scotsman’ on the disastrous rise of acidity in the oceans in time for the Holy Global Warming group hug in Copenhagen –


http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/world/Acid-oceans39the-evil.5903412.jp


I have a pertinent comment on this superfluous crapolla to remind everyone we are in a cooling period brought on by changes in our solar giant. This article is done in true East Anglia scientific method. Just as the East Anglia Acolytes dropped the warmer Middle Ages from their models on Holy Global Warming, these clowns have dropped the entire Age of Dinosaurs from their model of using the thirty percent acidity increase figure from industrialization. Dino the Dinosaur and Alley Oop didn’t work on assembly lines but with higher levels of CO2 and lush plant life due to SOLAR RAYS there was a much higher acidity to the ocean in the Age of Dinosaurs. We are in a cooling period and have been for over a decade. Acidity will stabilize, sea life will adapt, and acidity will eventually decrease. It will have nothing to do with mankind. It will have to do with SOLAR RAYS.

5 comments:

Charles Gramlich said...

I'm trying to figure out where you get your data that the world has been cooling since 1998. My understanding from the data is that atomspheric temperatures climbed pretty much throughout the entire 90s and then have been holding relatively steady, although the evidence is pretty strong that global ocean temps have continued to rise to the present day.

BernardL said...

Actually, I won't even list the multiple websites with exactly that data, Charles. I'm sure there are an equal number denying it. I will give you one of the East Anglia E-mails explaining why many thought the temps were going up, including scientists using East Anglia data, as Prof. Phil and his boys played 'Hide The Decline'.

Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,
Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later today or
first thing tomorrow.
I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps
to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from
1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline. Mike’s series got the annual
land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land
N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999
for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with
data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.
Thanks for the comments, Ray.

Cheers
Phil

Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) xxxxx
School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) xxxx
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email p.jones@xxxx.xxx
NR4 7TJ
UK

If you're interested, here's an article illustrating how they pumped the figures in New Zealand.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/#more-13215

Charles Gramlich said...

I tend to use NASA for my data.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2008/

BernardL said...

Nasa's satellite studies on anything global warming related date back only to 1979, Charles. Since then, they have obfuscated any facts or new data which went against their global warming cash cow. You've stated you wish money and politics weren't part of this. Well, Nasa is one of the most politicized and money driven organizations in the world.

BernardL said...

Charles, I forgot to ask why my reprint of chief East Anglia falsifier Dr. Phil's e-mail alluding to Michael Mann's neat nature 'trick' (The Hockey Stick Graph) and 'Hiding the Decline' didn't bother you. I would have thought that e-mail most damaging to any idea of an actual warming trend since 1998 because everyone else based their opinions on the falsified East Anglia data, including the UN.