Writing has been going very
well. I learned about a practice this week from an article my friend Jordan
Summers tweeted about. It’s called ‘Killing a Book’. According to the article,
a new practice in operation on Amazon involves authors who use their sock
puppet and trolls to fill a competing author’s reviews with one star hit
pieces. Another more subtle one is using trolls or sock puppets to put a
favorable review on an author’s book, and then using the same entity to trash
everything else the author has done, using the line ‘I really liked such and
such book, but this one is horrible’.
I thought it was strange when
the long knives came out in droves to eviscerate E.L. James for her ‘Fifty
Shades’ lightning strike. Then there was Stephen King announcing that Stephenie
Meyer ‘Can’t write worth a darn’. King’s statement was incomprehensible in that
he insulted a fellow author who not only was writing, but everything she wrote
sold in the millions of copies. Even if he were asked to critique Meyer’s
writing, he could have stated ‘I don’t care for her writing style, but
obviously I’m the only one’.
It makes me wonder – can’t
anyone simply be happy for another author's success? In the examples of hit pieces
done anonymously, did the perpetrator actually believe the readers would
immediately buy their offerings instead? In King’s case, did he think readers
hearing or reading his Meyer remark would then become his fan? In the ‘Fifty
Shades’ evisceration, you could at least tell that most of the remarks were
from people who had actually read the book, mostly because many of them were
very funny. I confess when I need a laugh, I go over to read comments on ‘Fifty
Shades’. I don’t agree with doing them, but there are some real comedians out
there doing the comments on ‘Fifty’. Besides, if I were E.L. James, I’d be on
the boards enjoying the hell out of it.
The ‘Book Killing’ phenomena is
much more dangerous. I have writing friends who have had this done to them.
They’re trying to make a living off their writing, and a ‘Killing’ will many
times drop sales down from the thousands to single digits. To me there’s no
excuse for one or two star bombers on Amazon concerning books. A reader is
allowed a very extensive preview of a book. If it’s poorly edited, written, or the
plot’s not what they thought, there is certainly ample warning to avoid
purchasing it. I’ll use my book MONSTER as an example. It’s over 640 pages long
by even Amazon’s calculation. They give the reader six full chapters to decide.
Believe me, if you read the first six chapters of MONSTER, you can make a
decision. :)
It's rough out there in the marketplace. :)
4 comments:
If someone dislikes a book, that is one thing, but this "attack" tactics is just beyond the pale. I'd not read any author who I found out engaged in that kind of behavior. I have given one or two stars to books that I really didn't like and have explained why, but have often used phrases like, "in my opinion," or "for me this didn't work." It only seems fair.
It is hard to imagine one author doing this to another, but they've caught them in the act on Amazon. It is a very strange phenomena, Charles.
Bernard, This tactic creeps me out. I think there are ways of saying that you didn't care for a book that discusses the book itself, but these are sneak attacks. It smacks of cowardice.
Personally, I don't review books that I'd give a one or two stars to because it's not worth my time.
If done by a fellow author, it's cowardice, greed, and envy, Jordan. It's very strange and disturbing. Amazon is trying to figure out a way to combat it, but it's an uphill battle.
I'm with you on the one and two star reviews, only since reading the lengthy previews on Amazon, I've avoided buying anything in the one and two star range. Authors have a rough enough time of it in this competitive marketplace as it is normally. Adding the element of 'Book Killing' really dredges the swamp.
Post a Comment