tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1405576651020920367.post5657704639946916899..comments2024-03-09T05:53:46.954-08:00Comments on Bernard's Blog: Snow Storms are now Global WarmingBernardLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09722619048888613647noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1405576651020920367.post-20171759910079401182011-03-04T06:14:32.238-08:002011-03-04T06:14:32.238-08:00Along with perpetrating the scam, they were invest...Along with perpetrating the scam, they were investing in the 'Carbon Market of Empty Air' at East Anglia along with some of the major newspapers in the UK, Charles - hence some of their more laughable predictions. Hell, the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change admitted to basing their glacier meltdown claim on a college students thesis paper theory. Then it was found they were heavily invested in the Carbon Market including their leader: Dr. Rajendra Pachauri. They've since backed off but it was too late for the UK who jumped off the climate cliff and imposed immediate taxes on their citizens based on East Anglia's and the UN's fraudulent claims. The Carbon Taxing Scam is not laughable. It is a vast criminal enterprise involving world leaders, UN climate committees, news organizations, and white lab coated frauds - plus their empty-headed Hollywood acolytes. Us common folk around the world are the victims and our wallets the target. Global Warming is a religion now... albeit a disgraced one.BernardLhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09722619048888613647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1405576651020920367.post-48167097375134923092011-03-03T18:54:06.278-08:002011-03-03T18:54:06.278-08:00Well that senior scientist needs to have his logic...Well that senior scientist needs to have his logic centers evaluated. That's just pretty dumb.Charles Gramlichhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02052592247572253641noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1405576651020920367.post-67097498438394320312011-03-03T10:05:05.813-08:002011-03-03T10:05:05.813-08:00Yes, they did predict it, Charles. The leaders at ...Yes, they did predict it, Charles. The leaders at East Anglia scam central came out in 2000 and claimed just that. Here's the quote: According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become "a very rare and exciting event".<br /><br />"Children just aren't going to know what snow is," he said. <br /><br />I'm not the one claiming that weather patterns don't fluctuate normally. I know the earth has been cooling for the last decade and I know it was heating the decade before that. The only culprit is the sun and there ain't enough money in the world to change that, but the Global Warming/Climate Con hucksters are going to try and steal it anyway.BernardLhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09722619048888613647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1405576651020920367.post-70004903065476164542011-03-03T08:49:12.672-08:002011-03-03T08:49:12.672-08:00You know I'm not a proponent of the "huma...You know I'm not a proponent of the "humans cause all global warming" theory, but I can't imagine that any scientist who gave it any thought would have predicted that global warming would produce "less" snow per se. One of the very first predictions of global warming would be an increase in evaporation and therefore an increase in all manner of precipitations, including snow. Unless or until the temperatures truly became extreme, global warming would be expected to increase total snow fall, but would also predict that the snow would be less likely to accumulate. Global warming would also be expected to change wind patterns as well, which would likely change the distribution of percipitation. Snow would fall in areas that wouldn't usually get it, and other areas that might have once expected snow might see a decrease or absence. no one has any idea exactly how warming temperatures would alter the big weather currents but that would be expected to happen.<br /><br />the thing is, weather patterns fluctuate naturally all the time and no single wet year, or dry year, (or decade) is any clear indication of shifts away from the average. There's also the tremendous role of the sun to consider. Lots of snow that does not accumulate could be consistent with a global warming hypothesis. However, there are other possible explanations as well, and one year isn't going to either prove or disprove global warming.<br /><br />Of course we are generally in the middle of a interglacial and the earth has warmed substantially since the ice age ended. The question is how much of that warming, if any, has been produced or accelerated by human beings. No one is going to answer that question by measuring the depth of the snow in Chicago for one winter.Charles Gramlichhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02052592247572253641noreply@blogger.com